Tuesday, March 13, 2018

The Face of Bigfoot


After being startled by a nearby rock clack, Jeff Yelek took a photo in the direction he had heard the sound. The above photo is the result.

17 comments:

  1. Nothing to see as usual. If they cant do any better than that then why even bother?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These sort of photos are a bit pointless.I can't see anything.Maybe Bruce can draw on it for us xx

      Delete
    2. Bruce can find a dogman in any photo !
      A class reunion photo? Bruce will find a hidden creature without any doubt. "School Griffen smiling at baby tree boy"
      haha
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
  2. Join the expedition to search for Mokele Mbembe in Congo/Cameroon - November 2018 -

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-mIkPDcU7g0

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's one of those paredidles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You could be right seeing as the Ikdummy boy is always beating his "drum".

      Delete
  4. I'm too busy destroying fake Patty!!! Yeah, got tons of proof, found A REAL CREATURE in the Patterson video too!
    TOTAL EPIC FAILURE IKDUMMY!

    OOPS, A RIP IN THE COSTUME!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a--m4o35PCE

    PLAIN COMMON SENSE TELLS YOU SHE'S FAKE!

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hCd6_QjexgE

    4:26, If that were true, anyone could. Ikdummy already proved my evidence true by not getting any pics of anything on any local walking trail. And that includes you, PIB, whoever!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh dear. Your drivel destroyed in one GIF;
      http://cryptomundo.com//wp-content/uploads/PattyF307F311ElbowJointLocAG2A.gif

      The Patterson Gimlin footage was not the result of anyone “sneaking up” on anything. They rounded a corner and there the subject was, seemingly off-guard. Bigfoot has been reported by tens of thousands of people by anything of to a 1000 different types of circumstances. Be it on horses, be it in cars, be it in groups, individuals hunting... the list of circumstances goes on and on leading to nothing but the total consistency of what we see in the PGF. The witness walking one way, the hominin in the other. If you had but a rudimentary understanding of the reports, you wouldn’t be embarrassing yourself now.
      “Patterson chose the area because of intermittent reports of the creatures in the past, and of their enormous footprints since 1958. (His familiarity with the area and its residents from prior visits may also have been a factor.) The most recent of these reports was the nearby Blue Creek Mountain track find, which was investigated by journalist John Green, Bigfoot hunter RenĂ© Dahinden, and archaeologist Don Abbott on and after August 28, 1967. This find was reported to Patterson (via his wife) soon thereafter by Al Hodgson, owner of the Willow Creek Variety Store, a five and dime at the time.”

      Darth Synmor -
      “Retire your channel.....It's pure garbage”

      Tony Montana -
      “this video didn't prove anything!“

      ... listen to your audience and give up.

      Delete
    2. “My last areas of observation are of the posterior lower leg and ankle. The two heads of the gastrocnemius muscle (medial and lateral) can be seen in the right leg. In spite of the “grainy” characteristic of the film, the contraction and relaxation of the heads of the gastrocnemius are observable, comparable to that seen in the triceps described above. The tendon of this muscle is of further interest. The Achilles’ tendon runs to its attachment on the calcaneus (heel bone). The tendon is seen with a depression anterior to it, correlated with the elongated heel and distance between the tendon and the tibia, as with the posterior knee, the creation of a depression with a costume is essentially impossible. Additionally, the end of the pant leg made from non-stretch material needs to be made wider to accommodate for the foot being passed through. This is clearly seen in the costume used in the MMP. There is no such excess of material seen in the PGF, with the gastrocnemius tapering into the ankle, and then widening out to the foot.“

      O. Allen Guinn, III, M.D., F.A.C.S. Aurora Plastic Surgery
      Lee’s Summit, MO

      Delete
    3. Oh... And you can’t replicate pareidolia, just as you refused to even attempt someone else’s.

      Delete
    4. ^ hasn`t the faintest idea.

      Delete
    5. 10,000 role-players allegedly in the woods of North America.

      And not a shred of evidence, other than conspiracy theories and conjecture.

      Now there’s a great idea.

      Delete
    6. Bruce really doesn't give up. He's either really into his role playing game as a bigfoot researcher or a total delusional loon of the highest degree
      cheers

      Joe

      Delete
    7. also Bruce:
      Patterson filmed a living creature that had movement on film. What did you ever get ? i have seen squat from you as far as any video footage of anything that appears to be moving. all you have my dear is nothing but twigs , leaves and branches along with tree bark that in your deluded fantasy you believe to be some fantastic imaginary creatures on par with anything from Narnia or lord of the rings .
      That Bruce, is an epic fail on the grandest level !
      CREASED !
      Cheers

      Joe

      Delete
  5. Don't quote something by another clueless non researcher, like Lorin Coleman! Anyone can study a person in a suit! All these yo-yo's have one thing in common, THEY DON'T FIELD RESEARCH!!!

    YOU'RE A SPECIAL KIND OF STUPID FOR NOT FIELD RESEARCHING, AND BELIEVING A FAKE! A FAKE THAT HAS NEVER BEEN REPLICATED!
    BIGFOOT EVIDENCE IS REPEATABLE, I DO IT EVERYDAY! AND SO WOULD EVERY RESEARCHER IF THEY PUT ENOUGH TIMNE IN!

    HERE'S THE FAKE RESEARCHERS, AND THE REAL ONE'S!
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CDO6WZAIQck

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RmUrBHw35q4

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XZehlAknVxU

    Funny how you never comment on the waste your time no evidence researchers, but shun the best evidence, and push Patty, who's FAKE!
    You refuse to field research, you refuse to take a single pic, refuse to take a pic of yourself, prove who you are and where you really live.
    Man, you sure are the lowest of the low1


    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You are not remotely qualified to claim who’s a genuine researcher or not. Look at your affiliates... there is nobody. You take blurry photos of brush. If footage of a creature that cannot be hoaxed (PGF) has a subject in it that leaves physical evidence behind that is not only found in another place in the States many years later... But is also found in another continent decades later, with different foot falls and impressions attesting to an actual biological foot, then that’s genuine repeatable evidence. Your version of repeatable evidence is the same colour blur in consecutive blurs. Not only does Patty enjoy consistency across innumerable reports... but the science is behind her as well.

      Got two blurry images that are the same?

      Got monkey suit, Bruce?

      Delete
  6. That's the face of pareidolia.

    ReplyDelete